ACTIVISTS JUMP NANCY PELOSI’S MANSION WALL WITH ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS, DEMAND ENTRY TO HER HOME

ACTIVISTS JUMP NANCY PELOSI’S MANSION WALL WITH ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS, DEMAND ENTRY TO HER HOME
4:32 PM 01/14/2019 | POLITICS
Benny Johnson | Columnist, Viral Politics

Right-wing activists stormed the security wall surrounding House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s California mansion and demanded access into the building Monday.

The group was led by Laura Loomer, an activist who has been at the center of many stunts, including interrupting congressional hearings and chaining herself to the doors of Twitter’s New York offices.

Loomer was joined by a small group of alleged illegal immigrants from Guatemala. Loomer and her accomplices carried a large banner with the faces of notable Americans who have been killed by illegal immigrant crime over the recent years attached to its surface. (RELATED: Trump: If Democrats Think A Wall Is ‘Immoral,’ They Should Do Something About The Vatican)

The entire event was live-streamed on Twitter.
https://dailycaller.com/2019/01/14/activists-pelosi-mansion-wall/?utm_medium=push&utm_source=daily_caller&utm_campaign=push

Senator Schumer Border Security Bill, Aug 12 2010 |

Senator Schumer Border Security Bill, Aug 12 2010 | Video | C-SPAN …
https://www.c-span.org/video/?295023-4/senator-schumer-border-security-bill

Aug 12, 2010 – Senator Schumer spoke in support of a $600 million border security bill, which provides an additional 1500 border agents, unmanned aerial drones and… … REPUBLICANS WORKING WITH SERIOUS DEMOCRATS TO GET THIS … Chuck Schumer U.S. Senator (Class 3) [D] New York … August 1, 2014 …

MINUTES. SMART >> TODAY I COME TO THE FLOOR TO SEEK UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO PASS ATY O SMART, TOUGH AND EFFECTIVECKS 600 MILLION-DOLLAR BILL THAT WILL SIGNIFICANTLY ENHANCE THELLY SECURITY AND INTEGRITY OF OUR NATIONS’ BORDER. Show Less Text
00:00:19
Unidentified Speaker
WHICH CURRENTLY LACKS THEND RESOURCES TO FULLY COMBAT THE DRUG SMUGGLERS, THE GUN RUNNERS, HUMAN TRAFFICKERS, MONEY LAUNDERERS AND OF ORGANIZED CRIMINALS BI THAT SEEK TO DO HARM TO INNOCENT AMERICANS ALONG OUR BORDER. PAY THE SENATE FIRST PASSED THIS BILL LAST WEEK BY UNANIMOUS CONSENT. AS LAST WEEK’S VOTE ENDED IMPASSE OVER HOW TO PAY FOR THIS PACKAGEILL THAT THAT ALL OF US AGREE NEEDED TO BE PASSED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. AT FIRST THE HOUSE PROPOSED SENATE, BORDER SE CURITY BILL BUT WAS NOT FULLY PAID FOR AND THUS WAS B UNACCEPTABLE TO MANY IN THEL, SENATE. E I COLLEAGUES ON THE OTHER SIDE WANTED TO PAY FOR THIS BILL BY DIVERTING CRITICAL FUNDS FROM THE STIMULUS BILL, THE RECOVERY ACT. OR THIS, TOO, WAS UNACCEPTABLE BECAUSE BORDER SECURITY DOES NOTECURITY NEED TO COME AT THE EXPENSE OF CREATING JOBS FOR MILLIONS OF AND AMERICANS. ASTE IMPORTANT AS BORDER SECURITY HIREE AGE IS, WE SHOULD NOT BE TAKING AWAYD OF JOBS FROM FIRE MEN IN BUFFALO AND TEACHERS IN SYRACUSE IN ORDER TO HIRE MORE AGENTS IN EL IREASED PASO. THIS THE WORST KIND OF ROBBING PETER TO PAY PAUL AND WAS SIMPLY WE AN UNACCEPTABLE WAY TO PAY FOR OR INCREASED BORDER SECURITY. SO INSTEAD OF RAISING THE ULMATELY G DEFICIT, WHICH WE DO NOT DO IN INC THIS BILL, OR DIVERTING VITAL STIMULUS ON THIS, THE SENATE HE ULTIMATELY AGREED TO PAY FOR THE BORDER PACKAGE BY INCREASING FEES ON COMPANIES WHO HIRE THE FOREIGN WORKERS IN A MANNER CONTRARY TO THE ORIGINAL INTENTNIMOUSLY OF THE H-1B VISA PROGRAM. HOUSE AFTER THE SENATE REACHED A TH COMPROMISE AND UNANIMOUSLYE ON APPROVED THE ORDER PACKAGE LASTESDAY. WEEK THE HOUSE APPROVED THE SAME THEE BORDER PACKAGE BY VOICE VOTE ON BECAU THE TUESDAY. REGRETTABLY THE HOUSE WAS NOT ABLE TO SIMPLY PASS THE SENATE B APPROVE BILL BECAUSE ACCORDING TO THE SENATE PACKA HOUSE RULES BECAUSE THE OF SAID THE UNANI C DID NOT ORIGINATED HAD TO BE COLLEUES T APPROVED BY THE HOUSE FIRST BEFORES A SENATE PASSAGE. FINALLY SO I SEEK UNANIMOUS CONSENT OF MY COLLEAGUES TO APPROVE THE THE BORDER SECURITY BILL AND FINALLYSARY PROVIDE PRESIDENT OBAMA AND SECRETARY NAPOLITANO WITH THEE THAT BOOTS ON THE GROUND AND RESOURCES NECESSARY TO COMBATHIS CRIME AND VIOLENCE THAT CURRENTLY EXISTS ON THE SOUTHERN BORDER. I WOULD LIKE TO THANK THE ORIGINAL CO-SPONSORS OF THIS LEGISLATION. SENATOR McCASKILL, SENATOR OF REID OF NEVADA, SENATOR INOUYE,LI MARY, FEINSTEIN, BINGAMAN, UDALL WOULD OF MEXICO, CASEY, MERKLEY, LINCOLN, YOU LOVE COLORADO, BEGICH AND BURRIS AND I WILL ALSO PARTICULARLY LIKE TO THANKND SENATOR KAFEEL AND MCKAY AND FOREING JOINING AS CO-SPONSORS PRIOR TO THAT ORIGINAL APPROVAL AND RECOGNIZE THIS BILL AS BEING SIGNIFICANT FOR BORDER SECURITY MENT, LEGISLATION. IN ADDITION TO PROVIDING A VITAL RESOURCES FOR SECURING OURECAUSE I SOUTHERN BORDER ALL OF WHICH IATH WILL DETAIL IN A MOMENT, ABS MR. PRESIDENT, THIS BILL ISTO HAVE ENORMOUSLY IMPORTANT BECAUSE ITTHE RE WILL CLEAR THE PATH FOR ENTIR RESTARTING THE BIPARTISAN DISCUSSIONS WE ABSOLUTELY NEED WE TO HAVE ON HOW BEST TO RESTORE B THE RULE OF LAW TO OUR ENTIRE IMMIGRATION SYSTEM. ALTHOUGH WE ALL AGREE THEY MUST THE SECURE OUR BORDERS, WE WILLWRONG WH NEVER FULLY RESOLVE THE PROBLEM HOUSE OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION UNTIL WE C FIX THOME ENTIRETY OF WHAT IS IN WRONG WITH OUR IMMIGRATION SYSTEM. A OF BUT THOSE OF US WHO CURRENTLYROUND A SUPPORTS COMPREHENSIVE REFORM ALSO BELIEVE IN PROVIDING ALL OF RECEIVED T THE RESOURCES OUR EXPERTS ON THE GROUND ARE TELLING US THE NEED KNOW THAT TO SECURE THE BORDER RIGHT NOW. M THAT’S WHY THIS BILL HAS GANG RECEIVED THE SUPPORT OF THE T ENTIRE SET. WE KNOW THAT KEEPING OUR BORDER SAFE FROM DANGEROUS GANGCONFIDENCE T MEMBERS, DEALERS AND HUMAN T TRAFFICKERS TO RESTORING PUBLICTOWA CONFIDENCE OF THE ENTIRETY OF THE FOCUS WITH REGARD TO LAWLESS IMMIGRATION POLICY IS GEARED COMME TOWARDS RESTORING TO WHAT HAS NATANO F BEEN A LAWLESS SYSTEM IN THE PAST. THIS THAT’S WHY I HAVE TO COMMEND THE T PRESIDENT AND SECRETARY NEED NAPOLITANO FOR THEIR TEARLESS WORK AND ADVOCATING FOR THE PASSAGE OF THIS PACKAGE TO GIVE OUR PEOPLE ON THE GROUND THE TOOLS THEY NEED TO SECURE THE BORDER. HERE ARE ALSO OF VITAL RESOURCES OUR BORDER SECURITY PACKAGE WILL FIRS WE PROVIDE. FIRST, WE PROVIDE OVER $250 MILLION TO HIRE 1,000 NEW BORDER PATROL AGENTS AND 500 SOUTHERN OFFICERS TO PERMANENTLY PATROLLED THEGE SOUTHERN BORDER. EPLOYED THESE AGENTS WILL FORM A STRIKE BO FORCE THAT WILL BE DEPLOYED IN AT A DIFFERENT ARNYEAS OF THE SOUTHWEST OUR BORDER DEPENDENT WHERE THE NEED WAYHERE IS GREATEST IN IN A PARTICULARINUOUS MOMENT. WE’LL FITENALLY HAVE THE CAPABILITY TO DEPLOY OURIN MANPOWER IN A WAY WHERE WE CAN SMUGGLERS CONTINUOUSLY AND IMMEDIATELY WE WIL CHANGE OUR TACTICS TO RESPOND TO DEPLOY CHANGES IN THE TACTICS OFE UNMAN SMUGGLERS ANDNE TRAFFICKERS. SECOND, WE WILL PROVIDE FUNDING TO DEPLOY MORE UNMANNED DRONES TO FLY ALONG OUR SOUTHERN BORDER TO PROVIDE AGENTS OFF THE GROUND WITH TIME INFORMATION ON ON WALL TH FULL BOREYDER CROSSINGS. WE ARE CURRENTLY DEPLOYED IN BOR SEVEN OF THESE UNMANNED DRONES ON THE BORDER. THEY HAVE PROVEN TO BE EFFECTIVE BECAUSE THEY PROVIDE THE BORDERLARGER PATROL AGENTS WITH VAST FORCE MULTIPLICATION THROUGH THEIR ABILITY TO IDENTIFY THE SAMEON LOCATIONS OF T LARGER GROUPS THATS DISPERSE INTO SMALLER GROUPSOVER A UPON ACCOUNT ENCOUNTERING BORDER SEGME PATROL AGENTS ON THE GROUND. THESE ADDITIONAL DRONES WILL OTRWISE HELP US GAINWOUL OPERATIONAL CONTROL OVER MUCH LARGER SOUTHERN BORDER TECH THAN WE OTHERWISE WOULD HAVE CONTROLLED BECAUSE THE PROVIDE MILES OF SURVEILLANCE CAPABILITYUNDS THAT IS TECHNOLOGICALLY CAPABILITI IMPOSSIBLE TO ACHESIEVE THROUGH OTHER MEANS. NFORCE FLORIDA, WEME WILL PROVIDE FUNDSISSUE TO IMPROVE COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITIES BETWEEN FEDERAL BORDER ENFORCEMENT AGENTS AND STATE AND LOCAL LAW OFFICERSD ALONG THE BORDER. COMMUNICATE THE I ISSUE HERE IS CRIME. ION POS OFFICERS WITH THE DIFFERENT AREAS OF EXPERTISE ANDFFICKING RINGS JURISDICTION NEED TO BE ABLE TOOCAL COMMUNICATE IN ORDER TO HAVE THE BEST INFORMATION POSSIBLE TOPABILITIL BREAK UP SMUGGLING AND TRAFFICKING RINGS IN BED INPROSEC OF LOCAL COMMUNITIES. RAFFIC THESE IMPROVED COMMUNICATION CAPABILITIES WILL LEAD TO OUR COUNTLESS MORE APPREHENSIONS AND BEGINS PROSECUTIONS OF BIG-TIME SMUGGLERS AND TRAFFICKERS. WITH AS AN EXAMPLE OF THE BORDER PATROL SUDDENLY BEGINS INROVIDE COUNTERING THE SURGE OF ILLEGAL BORDER CROSSERS FROM EL SALVADOR WE C WITH IDENTICAL TATTOOS ON THEIR S ARM IT’S IMPOSSIBLE THE PROVIDEHE THIS INFORMATION TO STATE AND THIS LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT ON THE GROUND SO WE CAN IMMEDIATELY HELP U BEGIN SHARING INTELLIGENCE TO DETERMINE WHETHER INDIVIDUALS WITH THIS DESCRIPTION HAVE BEEN ARR ESTED. THIS COORDINATION WILL HELP US DETERMINE THE EXACT CRIMINAL C INTENT OF THIS GROUP AND THEIRCONSTR METHOD OF OPERATION SO THEY CAN BERA EFFECTIVELY COMBAT IT. WE WILL PROVIDE FUNDS TO CONSTRUCT FORWARD OPERATING THAN BASIS FOR THE BORDER PATROL TOE USE THE CORRECTLY LOCATED ON THE A BORDER ITSELF RATHER THAN BORDER AND HUNDREDS OF MILES AWAY. IT IS INEFFICIENT FOR THE BORDER PATROL APPREHENDED THEN VEGETABLES ALONG THE BORDER AND F THEN HAVE TO DRIVE HOURS TO A BASES PLACE THAT PERSON IN DETENTION CR — TO PLACE THE PERSON IN DETENTION IN A FARAWAY BASE. THAT THESE FORWARD OPERATING BASE IS GROUND PROVIDE LOCATIONS MUCH CLOSER TOE THE BORDER. COMBATI WHERE THE DETAINEES CAN BEILLEGAL A BROUGHT FOR PROCESSING SO AGEROVIDE AGENTS ON THE GROUND CAN SPEND A MORE TIME COMBATING ILLEGALEMENT ACTIVITY ON T THE BORDER. FIFTH, WE WILL PROVIDE FUNDS FORG OUR IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENTT TO CONDUCT INVESTIGATIONS OF THE RES DRUG RUNNERS, MONEY LAUNDERERS AND HUMAN TRAFFICKERS ALONG THE BORDER. IT’S ALMOSTT IMPOSSIBLE TO FIND OUT THE RESOURCES AND THE USES OF SMUGGLING AND TRAFFICKINGT NEE FUNDS WITHOUT STRONG PLARS INTELLIGENCE AND INVESTIGATIONRE CAPABILITIES. THIS BILL WILL PROVIDE I.C.E. WITH RESOURCES IT NEEDS TO HUNTN DOWN THE MAJOR PLAYERS IN THE CARTEL’S RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAJORITY OF THE ILLEGALITIES ON THE SOUTHERN BORDER. FINALLY, WE WILL PROVIDE OVERBE 200 MILLION TO INCREASE THEOSECUTOR A NUMBER OF THE ATF, DEA AND FBI AGENTS ON THE BORDER TO BOLSTER THE NUMBER OF PROSECUTORS AND COURT RESOURCES ALONG THE BORDER SO THAT THE WRONGDOERS CAN BE DRU IMMEDIATELY BROUGHT TO JUSTICE. WE WILL DRAMATICALLY REDUCE THEERICAN PE CAN INCIDENCE OF ILLEGAL SMUGGLING OF GUNS AND DRUGS, CURRENCY THE ALONG THE BORDERS OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE CAN FEEL FARRESIDE SAFER LIVING IN OUR BORDER COMMUNITIES THAN THEY DO TODAY. AND THE BEST PART OF THIS BORDER DEFIT PACKAGE, MR. PRESIDENT, IS THAT. IT IS FULLY PAID FOR AND IT DOES NOT INCREASE THE DEFICIT BY AYIELD A SINGLE PENNY. IN ACTUALITY THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE, THE CBO DETERMINED THE BILL WILL YIELD ALY P DIRECT SAVINGS OF TAX PAYERS OF COMPA $50 MILLION. THE EMERGENCY BORDER FUNDS WE HIRE ARE PASSING TODAY ARE FULLY PAID CERTAIN FOR BY ASSESSING FEES ON CERTAIN TYPES OF COMPANIES WHO HIRET FOREIGN WORKERS USING CERTAIN TYPES OF VISAS IN A WAY THAT EVERY CONGRESS DID NOT INTEND. I WANT TO TAKE A MOMENT TO EXPLAIN EXACTLY WHAT WE ARE DOING IN THIS BILL LITTLE FURTHER BECAUSE I WANT EVERYONE I TO CLEARLY UNDERSTAND HOW THESE THE OFFSETS ARE DESIGNED. THERE’S BEEN SOME DISCUSSIONHE CONS ABOUT THIS PROPOSAL AND I THINK WE OUGHT TO LEAVE IT ON THE TABLE AND EXPLAIN IT CLEARLY. IN 1990 THAT CONGRESS REALIZED THE WORLD WAS CHANGING RAPIDLYO AND THAT TECHNOLOGICAL TECH INNOVATIONS LIKENOLO THE INTERNET WERE CREATING A HIGH DEMAND INEATED THE THE UNITED STATES FOR HIGH-TECH WORKERS TO CREATE TECHNOLOGIESLOYE AND PRSRODUCTS. SO CONSEQUENTLY CONGRESS CREATED SPECIAL THE H-1B VISA PROGRAM TO ALLOW U.S. EMPLOYERS TO HIRE FOREIGNPANIES THA USE TECH WORKERS AND SPECIALODAY CIRCUMSTANCES WHEN THEY COULDN’T FIND AN AMERICAN CITIZENRESS QUALIFIED. MANY OF THE COMPANIES TO USESE THIS PROGRAM TODAY ARE USING THEOSOFT PROGRAM IN EXACTLY THE WAY CONGRESS INTENDED. THAT IS THESE COMPANIES AND STUDTS E MICROSOFT AND IBM AND INTEL ARE O HIRING BRIGHT STUDENTS EDUCATED IN OUR AMERICAN UNIVERSITIES TO WORK IN THE U.S. FOR SIX OR SEVEN YEARS TO INVENT NEW ME PRODUCT LINES AND TECHNOLOGIES SO THAT MICROSOFT, IBM AND INTEL EXP CAN SELL MORE PRODUCTS TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC AND HIRE MORE COMPANIES AMERICAN WORKERS. D WORK THEN AT THERE EXPIRATION OF THE H-1B VISA PERIOD THESE COMPANIES OFTEN APPLY FOR THESE TALENTED WORKERS TO EARN GREEN CARDS AND GOO STAY WITH THE COMPANY. FOR T WHEN THE H-1B VISA PROGRAM IS T USED IN THIS MANNER IT’S A GOODCAN PEO WHO PROGRAM FOR EVERYONE INVOLVED. AND IT’S GOOD FOR THE COMPANY. IT’S GOOD FOR THE WORKER AND IT’S GOOD FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WHO BENEFIT FROM THE PRODUCTS AND JOBS CREATED BY THE INNOVATION OF THE H-1B VISA PROGRAM — THE H-1B VISA HOLDER. EVERY DAY COMPANIES LIKE ORACLE H1B AND CISCO AND APPLE AND OTHERSTHE USE THE H-1B VISA PROGRAM IN THE EXTRACT WE I DESCRIBED AND THE ELOIT PROGRAM HAS GREATLY BENEFITED THE COUNTRY. BUT RECENTLY SOME COMPANIES DECIDED TO EXPLOIT AN UNINTENDED LOOPHOLE IN THE PROGRAM TO USET WITH T THE PROGRAM IN A HEWAY THAT MANY IN CONGRERESS INCLUDING MYSELF DO MAKE NOT BELIEVE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PROGRAM’S INTENT. RATHER THAN BE A COMPANY THAT CREAT MAKES SOMETHING OR PROVIDES A SERVICE AND SIMPLY NEEDS TORE BRING A TALENTED WORKERS AND TO WE HELP IN AVEDA AND CREATE NEW PRODUCTS AND TECHNOLOGIES COME THESE OTHER COMPANIES AREB PROGRAAS ESSENTIALLY CREATINGHESE MULTINATIONAL AGENCIES THAT WERE NEVER CONTEMPLATED WHEN THE H-1BKE MICROSO PROGRAM WAS CREATED. THE BUSINESS MODEL OF THESEODEL NEWER COMPANIES IS NOT TO MAKE FIR B ANY NEW PRODUCT OR TECHNOLOGYS LIKE MICROSOFT OR APPLE DOES. LS INSTEAD, THE BUSINESS MODEL IS UNTERPAR TOTS FIRST BRING THE FOREIGN WORKERS INTO THE UNITED STATES IN WILLINGXC TO ACCEPT LESS PAY THAN THEIR AMERICAN COUNTERPARTS. NUMBER TWO, PLEASE THE WORKERS AND TO OTHER COMPANIES IN EXCHANGE FOR CONSULTING FEES. AND NUMBER THREE, TRANSFER THENIES WORKERS FROM COMPANY TO COMPANYO THEN TO MAXIMIZE PROFITS FROM THE PROVI PLACEMENTDE FEES. IN OTHER WORDS, THESE COMPANIESNEED ARE PETITIONING FOR THE WORKERS SIMPLY TO THEN TURN AROUND AND WORD PROVIDE THE SAME WORKERS TO OTHER COMPANIES WHO NEED CHEAPOME LABOR FOR VARIOUS SHORT-TERMHIN PROJECTS. SC DON’T TAKE MY WORD FOR IOPT. IF YOU LOOK AT THE MARKETING MATERIAL OF SOME OF THE COMPANIES THAT FALL IN THE SCOPEND COVERED BY TODAY’S LEGISLATION,GE IS THE MATERIALS BOAST ABOUT,ONDUCT W QUOTE, THEY’RE OUTSOURCING EXPERTISE AND SAY THAT THEIRTRAGE. TH ADVANTAGES AND ABILITY TO WH IS, CONDUCT WHAT THEY CALL LABOR ARBITRAGED, LABOR ARBITRAGED,NVIRONME THEY SAY WHICH IS IN THEIR OWN USED WORDS TRANSFERRING WORK FUNCTIONS TO A LOWER COST CREAT ENVIRONMENT FOR INCREASEDIDE SAVINGS. THE BUSINESS MODEL USED BY THESE COMPANIES WITHIN THE UNITEDTATION OF STATES ISTH CREATING THREEROGRAM NEGATIVE SIDE EFFECTS. FIRST IT IS RUINING THEUR REPUTATION OF THE H-1B PROGRAMO THAT IS OVERWHELMINGLY USED BY H1B GOOD ACTORS AND BENEFICIAL PURPOSES. SOME OF OUR COLLEAGUES HAVE LEGISLATION TO CURTAIL H-1B ITE BECAUSE THESE TYPES, OF ABUSES. LREA SECONDDY ACCORDING TO THE ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE IS LEARNING THE WAGES FOR AMERICAN TECHNICAL WORKERS ALREADY IN THEHN MARKETPLACE AND FAIR, IT’S ALSOING DISCOURAGING MANY OF OURFOR SMARTEST STUDENTS FROM ENTERING THEWO TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY IN THE FIRST PLACE. STUDENTS CAN SEE THAT PAYING WITH HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS FOR ADVANCED SCHOOLING IS NOTS WORTH THE COST WHEN THE MARKETEIGN EDUCA IS BEING FLOODED WITH FOREIGN TO TEMPORARY WORKERS WILLING TO DO THE TECHNICAL WORK FOR THE FAR THE COST LESS PAY BECAUSE THE EDUCATION WAS CHEAPER AND THE INTENT TO MOVE BACK HOME AND THE VISA EXPIRES TO A COUNTRY WHERE THE COST OF LIVING IS FAR LESS OF EXPENSIVE. EN THISSI TYPE OF USE OF THE H-1B VISA PROGRAM WILL BE ADDRESSED TO AS PART OF COMPREHENSIVE REFORM AND IS LIKELY GOING TO BE SYSTEM T DRAMATICALLY RESTRICTED W CERTAINLY IF I HAVE SOMETHING TO DO WITH IT AND WE WILL BE REFORMING THE BUIMMIGRATION SYSTEMCOUNTLES TO ENCOURAGE THE BEST AND BUT BRIGHTEST TO COME TO THE UNITED STATES AND CREATE TECHNOLOGIES AND BUSINESSES THAT WILL EMPLOY COUNTLESS AMERICAN WORKERS BUT DISCOURAGE BUSINESS FROM USING IMMIGRATION LAWS AS A MEANS TOSAL OBTAIN TEMPORARY AND LESS EXPENSIVE FOREIGN LABOR D TO ON REPLACE CAPABLE WORKERS. AND LET ME SAY OUR PROPOSAL HERE THE EXTRA DUTY ONLY GOES ON COMPANIES MORE THAN 50% FOREIGN WORKERS AND 50% H-1B WORKERS. THE ON THE COMPANY’S 50% H-1BOM WHAT WE WORKERS ARE THOSE JUST DOING THE POLICY I PROPOSED. OMPANIES CERTAINLY FAR FROM WHAT WE EVER WAYS, ENVISIONED WHEN THE H-1B PAST AND SO I SAY TO THOSE COMPANIES IF YOU DON’T CHANGE YOUR WAYS, YOU SHOULDN’T BE DOING WHEN YOU ARE DOING AND THIS DUTY ISABELED APPROPRIATE FOR THAT PURPOSE. SHOPS I DO WANT TO CLARIFY A PREVIOUS MISCHARACTERIZATION OF THE I FIRM’S WHERE I LABELED THEM CHOPD THAT’S SHOPS. THE STATEMENT WAS INCORRECT ANDHAT THEY I WISH TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT. IN THE TECHNICAL INDUSTRY THE FIRMS ARE KNOWN AS BODY SHOPS AND THAT IS WHAT I SHOULD HAVE SAID AND THAT IS WHAT THEY ARE. WHILE I STRONGLY OPPOSE THE MANNER IN WHICH THE FIRMS AREUNFORTUNAT USING THE H-1B TO ACCOMPLISH OBJECTIVES CONGRESS NEVER INTENDED, IT WOULD BE PURPO O UNFORTUNATE IF ANYONE CONCLUDE NOT FROM MY EARMARKS THESE OR ENGAGING IN ILLEGAL BEHAVIOR. BUT I ALSO WANT TO MAKE CLEAR ARTICLE THAT THE PURSPOSE OF THE FEE ISE AFFECD NOT TO TARGET BUSINESSES FROM ANY PARTICULAR COUNTRY. MANY NEWS ARTICLES REPORTED THE ONLY COMPANIES THAT WILL BETHIS AFFECTED BY THE FI ARE COMPANIES BASED IN INDIA AND THE FACTO I. T PURPOSE OF THE LEGISLATION MUSTOMPANIES BE TO TARGET THE I.T. COS. IT IS SIMPLY NOT TRUE THE PURPOSE IS TO TARGET INDIAN COMPANIES. WE ARE RAISING THE FEES FOR BUSINESSES WHO USE THE VISA TO DO THINGS THAT ARE CONTRARY TO WILL BE THE PROGRAMS OF ORIGINAL INTENT AND THAT WILL BE ON ANY COMPANY FROM ANY COUNTRY THAT DOES IT. THROUGHHE THEY WILL BE MORE THAN 50 P WORORKERS WHO CONTINUE TO EMPLOYNYONE — MORE THAN 50% OF THEIR EMPLOYEES THROUGH THE PROGRAM. THAT WAS NEVER EVEN ON ANY, ANYTHING CLOSE TO ANY MISFUD WHEN H-1B WAS PASSED. CONGRESS DOES NOT WANT THE H-1B PROGRAM TO BE A VEHICLE FORR GREETING MULTINATIONAL TEMP ENTE AGENCIES WHERE WORKERS DOR NOT KNOW WHAT PROJECTS THEY WILL BEN THE WORKING ON OR WHAT CITIES THEY WILL BE WORKING IN WHEN THEY IF Y’RE ENTER THE COUNTRY. THE FEE IS BASED UPON THE BUSINESS MODEL OF THE COMPANY, NOT THE LOCATION OF THE COMPANY. D IF YOU ARE USING THE H-1B TO ENERVATE PRODUCTS ANDY TECHNOLOGIES THAT IS A GOOD THING REGARDLESS WHETHER THESING COMPANY WAS ORIGINALLY FOUNDED IN INDIA, IRELAND OR INDIANA. BUT IF YOU ARE USING THE H-1B TO RUNTEMP A GLORIFIED INTERNATIONAL IN TEMP AGENCY FOR TEMP WORKERS AND COLL CONTRAVENTION OF THEEAGU SPIRITED PROGRAM ARE THE ADD MYT COLLEAGUES BELIEVE YOU SHOULD HAVE TO PAY A HIGH YOUR FEET TO US OF ENSURE THAT AMERICAN WORKERS AREHAT NOT LOSING THEIR JOBS BECAUSE OFNTEMPLATED. THE UNINTENDED USE OF THE VISASSE PROGRAM THAT WERE NEVER CONTEMPLATED AND THIS BELIEF IS CONSISTENT WHETHER THE COMPANY USES THE PRACTICES THAT WAS FOUNDED IN BANGALORE, BEIJING OR BOSTON. RAISING THE FEES FOR COMPANIES WOR HIRING MORE THAN 50% OF WORK TWO FORCE THROUGH THE VISA COMPLEXS IS TOO IMPORTANT GOALS. FIRST WILL PROVIDE THE NECESSARYDDING TO THE FUNDS TO SECURE THE BORDERND, IT WITHOUT RAISING TAXES OR ADDINGERS TO S THE DEFICIT. SECOND, IT WILL LEVEL THE CHEAP PLAYING FIELD FOR AMERICAN WORKERS SO THEY DON’T LOSE OUTAND LET ON GOOD JOBS HERE IN AMERICA BECAUSE IT IS CHEAPER TO BRING IM IN A BURGER THEN HIRE AN AMERICAN WORKER. AND LE T ME TELL YOU WHAT OBJECT A OF FOLKS AROUND THE WORLD AREJOURNAL” SAYING THAT THE IMPACT OF THE INCREASE. ON AUGUST 6, 2010 WALL STREET JOURNAL ARTICLE THE CEO OF A BILL BASE OFFSHORE ADVISORY-QUOTE CONSULTANT FIRM TOLD THE JOURNALO OF THE BILL WOULD, QUOTE, E ACCELERATE THE FIRMS PLANNING TO HIRE MORE AMERICAN-BORN WORKERS IN THE U.S.. JAY WHAT’S WRONG WITH THAT?OMPANY, AUGUST 7, 2010 ECONOMIC TIMES ARTRAGE ARTICLE, THE CEO OF A TOPEL COMPANY SAID THIS BILL WHAT A TH’S WHAT RISE W COST ARBITRAGE AND CAUSE AS CHANGE IN THE OPERATION MODEL OF ARE INDIAN OFFSHORE PROVIDERS. THAT’S WHAT WEBR WANT. THE LEADERS OF THE BUSINESSHERE IN MODEL ARE AGREEING THE BILL WILLAT MEA MAKE IT MONSRE EXPENSIVE TO BRING THE FOREIGN WORKERS TO COMPETE WITH AMERICAN TECH WORKERS FOR AGAIN. JOBS IN AMERICA. THAT MEANS THE COMPANIES ARES B GOING TO HAVE TO STARTIL TO HIGHER RES U.S. TECHNICAL WORKERS AGAIN. SO, MR. PRESIDENT, THIS BILL IS HI-PAYING AM NOT ONLY THE RESPONSIBLE BORDER F SECURITY BILINL IT HAS THE WILLWAO BE ADVANTAGE OF CREATING MORE HIGH-PAYING AMERICAN JOBS. FINALLY, MR. PRESIDENT, I WANTURE TO BE CLEAR ABOUT ONE OTHER THING. E RULE O EVEN THOUGH PASSING THIS BILL WILL SECURE OUR BORDER, I AGAIN SAY THE ONLY WAY TO FULLYSIVE RESTORE THE RULE OF LAW TO OURON ENTIRE IMMIGRATION SYSTEM IS BY PASSING COMPREHENSIVE REFORM, I IMMIGRATION REFORM. PEATED IN MY MANY MEETINGS WITH FOLKS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE ALTAR AB TO GAIN THEIR SUPPORT FOR COMPREHENSIVE REFORM IHEY WOULD REPEATEDLY HEARD THEM SAY ONCEO WE SHOWED WE WERE SERIOUS ABOUT ALL OF PASSING THE BORDER SECURITY LEGISLATION THEY WOULD BE TOTAKE ABO BEGIN WORKING WITH US TO FIX ALL THE OTHER ASPECTS OF THE BROKEN IMMIGRATION SYSTEM. LE BUT DOMESTIC OUT OF OUR ENTIRERY IMMIGRATION SYSTEM IS BROKEN. RY IT IS A O PATIENT THAT NEEDS CUR QUADRUPLE BYPASS SURGERY. AILME A SINGLE BYPASS SURGERY OF ENA BORDER SECURITY ALONE IS IMPORTANT BUT NOT ENOUGH TO CURENET TO THE AILMENT. WE ALSO NEED TO ENACT TOUGH AND SMART IMMIGRATION REFORM THAT WILL END THE JOBS MAGNET TO THE UNITED STATES BY REQUIRING THAT ALL LEGAL WORKERS SHOW A SECURE SOCIAL SECURITY CARD PRIOR TO OF ATTAINING THE JOB, THE VISAWN OVERSTATE FOR THE T ROBUST INTERIOR ENFORCEMENT AND REQUIRE ALL PERSONS ON LAWFULLY HERE MAKE THEIR PRESENCE KNOWN TO USE THAT BY REGISTERING WITH THE FEDERALG GOVERNMENT AND THEN EITHER GETTING RIGHT WITH THE LAW WERE LEAVING THE COUNTRY. CORESS A IT IS MY HOPE THE BILL WE ARE PASSING TODAY WILL BREAK THE DEADLOCK THAT HAS EXISTED IN CONGRESS AND WILL CLEAR THE PATH CAN TO FINALLY RESUME BIPARTISAN NEGOTIATIONS AND GOOD FAITH ON REFORMING OUR BROKEN IMMIGRATIONEERIOUS SYSTEM AND I INTEND TO DO SERUS EVERYTHING I CAN’T MAKE FUN OF A BUT NEGOTIATIONS CAN HAPPEN OUT OF THIN AIR. EAGUES IT WILL TAKE SERIOUS REPUBLICANS WORKING WITH SERIOUS DEMOCRATS TO GET THIS DONE AND I URGE MY THIS COLLEAGUES ON BOTH SIDES OF THE S OF OIL TO JOIN THIS IMPORTANT OUR TASK. WITH THE BILL’SUE PASSAGE TODAY AISLE WE’VE CLEARLY SHOW WE ARE SERIOUS ABOUT SECURING OUR NATION’S BORDER. IT’S TIME FOR OUR COLLEAGUES ON BOTH SIDES OF THE OGLE TO JULY IT’S AND FIXING OUR ENTIRE BROKEN IMMIGRATION SYSTEM. WE URGE FOR IMMIGRATION REFORM CANNOT BE OVERSTATED BECAUSE IT IS SO OVERDUE. IT TIME FOR EXCUSES IS NOW OVER. THE TIME TO GET TO WORK IS

Obama’s GAVE IRAN $$$$$$$$$ – Dems no $$$ FOR WALL.

US sent plane with $400 million in cash to Iran
By Elise Labott, Nicole Gaouette and Kevin Liptak, CNN
Updated 11:53 AM ET, Thu August 4, 2016

In announcing the agreement, Obama said that paying the $400 million — plus $1.3 billion in interest — was saving American taxpayers billions of dollars. The Iranians had been seeking more than $10 billion at arbitration.
“For the United States, this settlement saved us billions of dollars that could have been pursued by Iran,” Obama said in January. “There was no benefit to the United States in dragging this out.

JUST WATCHED
Iran receives $400 million same day Americans released

Washington (CNN)The Obama administration secretly arranged a plane delivery of $400 million in cash on the same day Iran released four American prisoners and formally implemented the nuclear deal, US officials confirmed Wednesday.

President Barack Obama approved the $400 million transfer, which he had announced in January as part of the Iran nuclear deal. The money was flown into Iran on wooden pallets stacked with Swiss francs, euros and other currencies as the first installment of a $1.7 billion settlement resolving claims at an international tribunal at The Hague over a failed arms deal under the time of the Shah.
A fifth American man was released by Iran separately.

Details of the cash delivery drew fresh condemnation of the Iran deal from Republicans. They charged that the administration had empowered a major sponsor of terrorism because the nuclear agreement enables Tehran to re-enter the international economy and gives it access long-frozen funds.
In addition, they said the cash delivery amounted to a ransom payment that violates long-standing US practice not to pay for hostages. As such, they argued, it encourages Iran to hold onto its remaining Americans prisoners until they can get more money for them.
“Paying ransom to kidnappers puts Americans even more at risk,” said Illinois Republican Sen. Mark Kirk. “While Americans were relieved by Iran’s overdue release of illegally imprisoned American hostages, the White House’s policy of appeasement has led Iran to illegally seize more American hostages, including Siamak Namazi, his father Baquer Namazi and Reza Shahini.”
Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump jumped on the issue, seeking to change the subject after a punishing week of gaffes and reproaches from members of the GOP.
“Iran was in big trouble, they had sanctions, they were dying, we took off the sanctions and made this horrible deal and now they’re a power,” Trump said Wednesday in Daytona, Florida.
“We paid $400 million for the hostages,” Trump said. “Such a bad precedent was set by Obama. We have two more hostages there right? What’s are we going to pay for them? What we’re doing is insane.”
Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, when asked about the payment by a local Denver, Colorado, television station, said it was “old news.”
“It was first reported about seven or eight months ago, as I recall,” she told Denver’s 9News. “And, so far as I know, it had nothing to do with any kind of hostage swap or any other tit-for-tat. It was something that was intended to, as I am told, pay back Iran for contracts that were canceled when the Shah fell.”
US officials said cash had to be flown in because existing US sanctions ban American dollars from being used in a transaction with Iran and because Iran could not access the global financial system due to international sanctions it was under at the time. The details of the how the transaction occurred were first reported by The Wall Street Journal. CNN reported in January that the transfer of funds had been arrangement.
The money was procured from central banks in Switzerland and the Netherlands, official said, and an unmarked cargo plane loaded with Swiss francs, euros and other currencies were flown to Iran.
“They were totally cut off from global banks and there was no other way to get them the money,” one senior official with knowledge of the transaction said.
While the cash transaction took place the same day as the release of Washington Post reporter Jason Rezaian and the other Americans, administration officials insist the payment did not constitute ransom and that there were was no quid pro quo for the payment. They said the agreement on the release of the prisoners dovetailed with the resolution of parallel negotiations over the dispute of the failed arms deal.
“It’s against the policy of the United States to pay ransom for hostages,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said Wednesday.
He described the payment as a “conscious strategic decision that was made on the part of the Obama administration as we were implementing the deal to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon to resolve other longstanding concerns we had with Iran.”
“That included securing the release of five American citizens who had been unjustly detained in Iran, and closing out a longstanding financial dispute in a way that saved the American people potentially billions of dollars,” he said.
CNN Politics app
In return for the US citizens’ release, the US dropped extradition requests for 14 Iranian citizens and freed seven. Former FBI agent Robert Levinson, who disappeared in Iran in 2007, remains missing.
Earnest cast those using the new details about the palettes of cash as people “flailing to justify their continued opposition to the deal to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.”
The $400 million was Iran’s to start with, placed into a US-based trust fund to support American military equipment purchases in the 1970s. When the Shah was ousted by a 1979 popular uprising that led to the creation of the Islamic Republic, the US froze the trust fund. Iran has been fighting for a return of the funds through international courts since 1981.
In announcing the agreement, Obama said that paying the $400 million — plus $1.3 billion in interest — was saving American taxpayers billions of dollars. The Iranians had been seeking more than $10 billion at arbitration.
“For the United States, this settlement saved us billions of dollars that could have been pursued by Iran,” Obama said in January. “There was no benefit to the United States in dragging this out.”
As it was making the January cash delivery, the US also imposed new sanctions on Iran over its ballistic missile testing. At the same time, the White House unfroze a larger pool of Iranian assets, estimated at $100 to $150 billion, as part of the nuclear deal, though administration officials cautioned that Iran would only pocket about $50 billion after legal claims.
Legal claims are one of the reasons the payment to Iran was controversial when Obama first announced it. The Clinton administration had agreed in 2000 to pay that $400 million to Americans who had won lawsuits against Iran in US courts.
These families and individuals had sued the Islamic Republic for damages after the deaths of loved ones or for being the victims themselves of Iran-backed kidnappings or terrorist attacks. At the time, US officials told those families the money would come from Iran.
With Obama’s announcement, it became apparent that the payments had come from US taxpayers and not from Iran at all.
Stuart Eizenstat, the Clinton administration’s deputy Treasury secretary, told Newsweek that Iran had filed a claim with The Hague, limiting the administration’s ability to lay claim to the fund.
Critics on Wednesday were further incensed by Iranian claims that the cash amounted to a ransom payment for the four prisoners.
“That sort of ransom payment as part of the Iran deal is an outrage,” said Republican Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida.
US officials conceded that the Iranian negotiators involved in the prisoner exchange said they wanted the cash to coincide with the release of the Americans to prove a deliverable for the exchange even as they argued against the characterization of it as a ransom payment.
“As we’ve made clear, the negotiations over the settlement of an outstanding claim at The Hague Tribunal were completely separate from the discussions about returning our American citizens home,” State Department Spokesman John Kirby said, referring to the $1.7 billion payout that the $400 cast installment was part of.
“Not only were (the) two negotiations separate, they were conducted by different teams on each side, including, in the case of the Hague claims, by technical experts involved in these negotiations for many years,” he said. “The funds that were transferred to Iran were related solely to the settlement of a long-standing claim at the US-Iran Claims Tribunal at The Hague.”
“It’s not surprising that Iran would want to call this a ransom for domestic political reasons,” another senior US official said. “But that is not the case. The confidence built during the Iran nuclear negotiations helped the negotiations in other areas, so it is true all these things came together at the same time as implementation day of the Iran deal. But this was not a ransom.”
CNN’s Laura Koran contributed to this report.

FullscreenNow Playing Iran receives $400…
Source: CNN

Iran receives $400 million same day Americans released 02:27

https://www.cnn.com/2016/08/03/politics/us-sends-plane-iran-400-million-cash/index.html

LOCAL // POLITICS Party official accuses state Democratic chairman of sexual misconduct

https://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/Party-official-accuses-Democratic-chairman-Bauman-13418913.php?utm_source=email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=newsletter&utm_campaign=sfc_morningfix
Dominic Fracassa Nov. 24, 2018 
Updated: Nov. 24, 2018 7:55 p.m.
California Democratic Party Chairman Eric Bauman has been accused of sexually assaulting or harassing staff members by Vice Chairman Daraka Larimore-Hall, the party’s third-in-command.

Eric Bauman is a 

California Democratic Party Chairman Eric Bauman has been accused of sexually assaulting or harassing staff members by Vice Chairman Daraka Larimore-Hall, the party’s third-in-command.

In an email sent Saturday to the party’s executive board, Larimore-Hall said he has filed a complaint with the party’s human resources department, calling for Bauman to be removed as chairman in light of what Larimore-Hall called “credible, corroborated and utterly heart-breaking allegations.”

Eric Bauman is accused of sexually assaulting or harassing staff members.Photo: Rich Pedroncelli / Associated Press 2017

2of 43Recent sexual harassment and abuse allegationsPhoto: AP
3of 43A New York Times article uncovered multiple incidents of Harvey Weinstein’s sexually harassment or abuse. Thousands of women embracing the #MeToo movement to own their histories of sexual harassment and abuse, and those issues swirling at high volume in the culture overall, parents are reaching for teachable moments in the post-Weinstein Photo: Chris Pizzello, Chris Pizzello/Invision/AP












 

In an email sent Saturday to the party’s executive board, Larimore-Hall said he has filed a complaint with the party’s human resources department, calling for Bauman to be removed as chairman in light of what Larimore-Hall called “credible, corroborated and utterly heart-breaking allegations.”

SFC-logo

Already a Subscriber? LoginYou’ve reached your monthly article limit.Subscribe now to keep reading.

Unlimited 
Digital Access 
99¢ for the 1st month!GET DIGITAL

Sunday Print & 
Unlimited Digital Access 
$15 for 4 weeksGET SUNDAY

Daily Print & 
Unlimited Digital Access 
$30 for 4 weeksGET DAILYLearn more 

down-arrow

Cancel Anytime

In an email sent Saturday to the party’s executive board, Larimore-Hall said he has filed a complaint with the party’s human resources department, calling for Bauman to be removed as chairman in light of what Larimore-Hall called “credible, corroborated and utterly heart-breaking allegations.”

Related Stories

The allegations of sexual assault that @DarakaKenric is filing against @EricBaumanare shocking. CalDems should replace him with @mldauberwho is one of the nation’s foremost scholars on sexual harassment & led the Persky recall campaign. We need a bold feminist to lead for 2020.— Ro Khanna (@RoKhanna) November 24, 2018

Dominic Fracassa is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. Email: dfracassa@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @dominicfracassaMoreCommentsPrint

Photo of Dominic Fracassa
Dominic Fracassa

Follow Dominic on:https://www.facebook.com/SFChronicle/DominicFracassa

Dominic Fracassa covers San Francisco City Hall for The Chronicle. He previously worked as a reporter and editor for the Daily Journal, a legal affairs newspaper. He started in news in his home state of Michigan, where he worked as a news director of 103.9 WLEN.

Past Articles from this Author:

ccused of sexually assaulting or harassing staff members.Photo: Rich Pedroncelli / Associated Press 2017

2of 43Recent sexual harassment and abuse allegationsPhoto: AP
3of 43A New York Times article uncovered multiple incidents of Harvey Weinstein’s sexually harassment or abuse. Thousands of women embracing the #MeToo movement to own their histories of sexual harassment and abuse, and those issues swirling at high volume in the culture overall, parents are reaching for teachable moments in the post-Weinstein Photo: Chris Pizzello, Chris Pizzello/Invision/AP

California Democratic Party Chairman Eric Bauman has been accused of sexually assaulting or harassing staff members by Vice Chairman Daraka Larimore-Hall, the party’s third-in-command.

In an email sent Saturday to the party’s executive board, Larimore-Hall said he has filed a complaint with the party’s human resources department, calling for Bauman to be removed as chairman in light of what Larimore-Hall called “credible, corroborated and utterly heart-breaking allegations.”

SFC-logo

Already a Subscriber? LoginYou’ve reached your monthly article limit.Subscribe now to keep reading.

Unlimited 
Digital Access 
99¢ for the 1st month!GET DIGITAL

Sunday Print & 
Unlimited Digital Access 
$15 for 4 weeksGET SUNDAY

Daily Print & 
Unlimited Digital Access 
$30 for 4 weeksGET DAILYLearn more 

down-arrow

Cancel Anytime

In an email sent Saturday to the party’s executive board, Larimore-Hall said he has filed a complaint with the party’s human resources department, calling for Bauman to be removed as chairman in light of what Larimore-Hall called “credible, corroborated and utterly heart-breaking allegations.”

Related Stories

The allegations of sexual assault that @DarakaKenric is filing against @EricBaumanare shocking. CalDems should replace him with @mldauberwho is one of the nation’s foremost scholars on sexual harassment & led the Persky recall campaign. We need a bold feminist to lead for 2020.— Ro Khanna (@RoKhanna) November 24, 2018

Dominic Fracassa is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. Email: dfracassa@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @dominicfracassaMoreCommentsPrint

Photo of Dominic Fracassa
Dominic Fracassa

Follow Dominic on:https://www.facebook.com/SFChronicle/DominicFracassa

Dominic Fracassa covers San Francisco City Hall for The Chronicle. He previously worked as a reporter and editor for the Daily Journal, a legal affairs newspaper. He started in news in his home state of Michigan, where he worked as a news director of 103.9 WLEN.

Past Articles from this Author:

‘Trump Was Right,’

FEATURE
WATCH: Mexican Protesters Warn ‘Trump Was Right,’ Caravan ‘Is An Invasion’
https://twitter.com/twitter/statuses/1064330909329936384
https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1064330909329936384

Hundreds of Tijuana residents gathered on Sunday to protest the caravan migrants that are coming through Mexico to the United States, warning that “Donald Trump was right, this is an invasion!” and chanting, “Get out Hondurans, we do not want you here.”
“Tijuana residents waved Mexican flags, sang the Mexican national anthem and chanted ‘Out! Out!’ in front of a statue of the Aztec ruler Cuauhtemoc … they accused the migrants of being messy, ungrateful and a danger to Tijuana,” The Associated Press reported. “They also complained about how the caravan forced its way into Mexico, calling it an ‘invasion.’ And they voiced worries that their taxes might be spent to care for the group.”
Ryan Saavedra

FAKE CARAVAN – LUNATICS SAID SO!

Embedded video

U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials posted a video on social media Friday showing someone attempting to dismantle concertina wire along a section of the fence separating the U.S. and Mexico.

Officers say a U.S. Border Patrol thermal imaging camera captured the video on Wednesday at approximately 7 p.m. south of Imperial Beach, California.

 

 

 

 

CBP San Diego

@CBPSanDiego
Footage from a #USBP thermal camera captures multiple men climbing the border barrier near Imperial Beach and destroying recently installed concertina wire. All seeking to enter the U.S. are urged to do so at one of more than 320 official U.S. Ports of Entry. #CBP #bordersecurity

9:23 AM – Nov 16, 2018 · San Diego, CA
What is unknown is who was on the Mexico side of the fence stepping on the wire and pushing it down to the ground.

On Thursday, U.S. Marines were guarding construction workers as they reinforced the fence that extends along the beach into the Pacific Ocean west of the San Ysidro Port of Entry, the busiest land border crossing.


https://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/Video-Shows-Dismantling-of-Razor-Wire-on-Border-Fence-San-Diego-500703881.html